What type of study is this?

October 2, 2025Open Access

Reliability of remote self-administered web-based digital cognitive measures and comparison to in-person neuropsychological tests: Stricker Learning Span, Symbols Test and the Mayo Test Drive Screening Battery Composite

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

Observational analysis shows good reliability of remote cognitive measures in 1,846 participants, indicating viability for longitudinal assessments.

Remote digital cognitive measures demonstrated reliable performance, supporting their use in monitoring cognitive health over time.
Intraclass correlation coefficients for the Mayo Test Drive revealed good reliability with total ICCs at 0.79, comparable to traditional tests.
Participants had an average age of 70, and included a diverse demographic with 48% male and 96% White individuals.
The study assessed test-retest reliability using various statistical methods, comparing remote measures to in-person neuropsychological evaluations.

Hughes et al. (2025) studied this question.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Observational analysis shows good reliability of remote cognitive measures in 1,846 participants, indicating viability for longitudinal assessments.