Background Easily accessible and self-administered cognitive assessments that can aid early detection for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) dementia risk are critical for timely intervention. Objectives/Design This cross-sectional study investigated continuous associations between Mayo Test Drive (MTD) – a remote, self-administered, multi-device compatible, web-based cognitive assessment – and AD-related imaging biomarkers. Participants/Setting 684 adults from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging and Mayo Clinic Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center participated (age=70.4±11.2, 49.7% female). Participants were predominantly cognitively unimpaired (CU; 94.0%). Measurements Participants completed (1) brain amyloid and tau PET scans and MRI scans for hippocampal volume (HV) and white matter hyperintensities (WMH); (2) MTD remotely, consisting of the Stricker Learning Span and Symbols Test which combine into an MTD composite; and (3) in-person neuropsychological assessment including measures to obtain Mayo Preclinical Alzheimer’s disease Cognitive Composite (Mayo-PACC) and Global-z. Multiple regressions adjusted for age, sex, and education queried associations between imaging biomarkers and scores from remote and in-person cognitive measures. Results Lower performances on MTD were associated with greater amyloid, entorhinal tau, and global tau PET burden, lower HV, and higher WMH. Mayo-PACC and Global-z were associated with all imaging biomarkers except global tau PET burden. MCI/Dementia participants showed lower performance on all MTD measures compared to CU with large effect sizes (Hedge’s g’s=1.65-2.02), with similar findings for CU versus MCI only (Hedge’s g’s=1.46-1.83). Conclusions MTD is associated with continuous measures of AD-related imaging biomarkers, demonstrating ability to detect subtle cognitive change using a brief, remote assessment in predominantly CU individuals and criterion validity for MTD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boots et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: