National-scale analysis shows wetlands' nutrient removal declines with higher human disturbance, indicating scale and disturbance level matter.
The efficiency of wetlands in removing nutrients from streams and rivers can be accurately evaluated using diatom-inferred total phosphorus (DI-TP), as DI-TP integrates the effects of various environmental factors. However, studies assessing the efficiency of an extensive set of wetlands at multiple scales and under different levels of human disturbance activities (HDA) in removing DI-TP from streams and rivers are sparse. A national-scale dataset from the U.S. EPA’s 2008–2009 National Rivers and Streams Assessment survey provides a unique opportunity to answer this question. Our results showed that, compared to watershed-scale wetlands, local-scale wetlands performed better at removing DI-TP from streams and rivers. Additionally, wetlands performed better at removing DI-TP under lower levels of HDA, suggesting that high levels of HDA could alter the structure and function of wetlands enough to affect their ability to remove nutrients. Interaction analysis revealed there was a significant positive relationship between HDA and local-scale wetlands. We conclude that DI-TP is a valuable metric for evaluating the effectiveness of wetlands at removing nutrients from streams and rivers. To support freshwater management, both the spatial scale of wetlands and the level of HDA on wetlands, along with their cross-scale interactions, should be considered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: