Cross-sectional analysis evaluates how dietary inflammation and socioeconomic status impact depression and constipation outcomes.
Background This study investigated the relationship between depression and constipation and examined potential mediating roles of dietary inflammatory index (DII) and socioeconomic status using data from NHANES 2005–2010. Methods We analyzed 12,854 adults with complete data on depression (PHQ-9), constipation (self-report/Bristol Stool Scale), DII (27 nutrients), and poverty-to-income ratio (PIR). Statistical analyses included multivariable logistic regression with appropriate reference categories, restricted cubic splines (RCS), mediation analysis, and subgroup assessments. Results Constipated individuals exhibited significantly higher depression severity (mean PHQ-9: 4.25 vs. 3.00), higher DII (2.00 vs. 1.37), and lower PIR (all p < 0.0001). After adjustments, PHQ-9 scores were independently associated with constipation risk (OR: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.03–1.06), with a non-linear relationship showing an inflection point at PHQ-9 = 10 (scores <10: OR = 1.08; scores ≥10: OR = 0.98). Statistical mediation analysis revealed that DII mediated 6.03% and PIR mediated 12.46% of the depression–constipation association. Subgroup analyses demonstrated consistent associations across all demographic and clinical subgroups (OR range: 1.04–1.14). Conclusion This cross-sectional study demonstrates a significant non-linear relationship between depression and constipation, partially mediated by dietary inflammation and socioeconomic status. Longitudinal studies are needed to establish causality and directionality between these variables.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: