Corruption court ruling exposed budget markup schemes for village road work, indicating accountability issues.
The crime of corruption of marking up the budget for village road improvement work is carried out with various modes of operation such as making a budget plan above market price then paying based on another agreement, temporarily borrowing village funds by transferring funds to a personal account then not returning it. The results of the study indicate that the corruption of the markup of the village road improvement budget is the Village Fund Budget that has been disbursed by the defendant Darma Suardi as the Head of Tanah Besih Village together with Muhammad Noor as the Treasurer of Tanah Besih Village, but in carrying out activities using village funds, other village officials were not involved. The accountability of the perpetrators of the criminal act of corruption of the markup of the village road improvement budget in the PN decision. Corruption Case No.67/Pid.Sus.TPK/2019/PN.Mdn is Darma Suardi sentenced to 6 (six) years in prison and a fine of Rp.200,000,000,- (two hundred million rupiah).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Budi et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: