This analysis uncovers criminal liability in budget misuse by public officials, highlighting the need for stronger oversight.
Introduction: This study examines the form of criminal liability of public officials involved in corruption crimes, particularly in the misuse of state budgets. The case analyzed is Decision Number 15/Pid.Sus-TPK/2020/PN.MNK involving Ahmad Afit Rumagesan, Chairman of the Fakfak District Parliament for the 2009–2014 period.Purposes of the Research: This study underscores the importance of strengthening oversight in public financial management to prevent future budget misuse.Methods of the Research: This research applies a normative juridical method with a case study approach.Findings of the Research: The findings indicate that the defendant was proven to have misused the treasurer's cash funds for personal purposes without a legitimate legal basis, resulting in a state loss of IDR 432,425,000. In passing the verdict, the judge considered the state's financial loss, the defendant's role, and the absence of good faith to return the funds.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kawuryan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: