Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis shows how the Augar review shapes post-18 education funding in humanities, suggesting new directions for policy.
It has always "amused" me, to some extent, that the Augar review of post-18 education and funding was conducted by a bloke whose name is a near homonym for "augur", the noun form of which denoted, in Ancient Rome, a religious official who observed natural signs, especially the behaviour of birds, interpreting these as an indication of divine approval or disapproval of a proposed action.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martin Paul Eve (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: