Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
October 2, 2025Iraqi Geological JournalOpen Access

The Suitability of Misan Soils for Raw and Stabilized Rammed Earth Construction Methods

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

RJRiaed Saee Jassim

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

This analysis reports the compressive strength of stabilized versus non-stabilized rammed earth in Misan, suggesting potential for eco-friendly building.

Key Points

  • Stabilized rammed earth samples exhibited higher compressive strength than non-stabilized ones, indicating better performance.
  • Laboratory tests revealed that stabilized samples had a compressive strength, showcasing their suitability for construction.
  • The materials from Misan province were found effective for both raw and stabilized rammed earth construction methods.
  • The use of stabilized rammed earth in construction allows for stronger and more durable wall structures compared to non-stabilized methods.

Cite This Study

Riaed Saee Jassim (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68de79595b556a9128e1a3dbhttps://doi.org/10.46717/igj.2025.58.2c.10
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Evaluation of Strength Characteristics of Cement-Stabilized Rammed-Earth Material2025
  2. 2Compressive Properties of Rammed Earth at Ming Great Wall Sites in Northwest China: Effects of Material Sourcing and Rammed Technology2026 · 1 citations
  3. 3Variability in Compression Strength of Rammed Earth Walls2024
  4. 4Durability of bio-stabilized rammed earth evaluated through water absorption tests with increasing severity2026
  5. 5Sustainable Analysis of Cement-Stabilized Rammed Earth Construction in Rural Areas: A Case Study in Southeast China2024