PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 2, 20250 citationsOpen Access

Optimization strategies for multidisciplinary team management in abnormal pregnancy cases: a prognosis-risk grading evaluation of 310 fetuses with structural anomalies

View Full Paper
TLTianci LiuYLY LiuXFXin Feng

Key Points

  • Effective management strategies improved outcomes for fetuses with structural anomalies, enhancing care.
  • Significant differences in live birth rates were noted across various risk groups, showing risk stratification benefits.
  • Likelihood ratios revealed varied predictions of fetal survival, illustrating the importance of prognostic classification.
  • Fetuses with multiple structural anomalies experienced higher rates of NICU admissions and developmental delays.

Abstract

Abstract Purpose To describe our experience with multi-disciplinary team (MDT) in managing abnormal pregnancies and to analyze the impact of MDT on pregnancy management and outcomes under a prognosis-risk classification. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 356 abnormal pregnancy cases managed by MDT, with emphasis on operational protocols, management strategies, and neonatal outcomes. In accordance with MDT recommendations, 310 fetuses with structural anomalies were classified into five prognostic categories based on the Kukora et al. classification system, and three risk groups according to disease severity and clinical outcomes. Statistical analyses were performed using chi-square tests (χ²) to evaluate the differences between groups with isolated versus multiple fetal structural abnormalities, as well as among various risk-stratified groups. The predictive accuracy of MDT assessments regarding fetal prognosis was quantitatively evaluated through likelihood ratio (LR) calculations. Results (1) Distribution of MDT Consultation Cases by Reason (N = 356): fetal structural abnormalities: 310 cases (310/356, 87.1%); genetic counseling: 41 cases (41/356, 11.5%); maternal medical conditions: 5 cases (5/356, 1.4%). (2) Kukora et al. prognostic classification: The likelihood ratios for MDT-predicted fetal survival were: LR I = 7.18, LR IIA = 6.60, LR II = 0.27, LR IIB = 0.024, LR III = 0.01. (3) Risk stratification: Live birth rates showed significant differences across risk groups (χ² = 124.23, P P P P = 0.026), NICU admission (χ² = 12.995, P P = 0.031) compared to those with single structural abnormalities. Conclusion In the routine multidisciplinary team consultation practice, we introduced prognostic classification and risk stratification as an exploratory approach. This method provides an additional framework for managing abnormal pregnancy, potentially offering support from prenatal assessment through postpartum care.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Liu et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68de79615b556a9128e1a61fhttps://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7472957/v1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Mini-Puberty, Physiological and Disordered: Consequences, and Potential for Therapeutic Replacement2024 · 106 citations
  2. 2Fetal neonatal hyperthyroidism: diagnostic and therapeutic approachment2017 · 34 citations
  3. 3Understanding the Parent Perspective on Prenatal Consultation for Fetuses with Congenital Anomalies2017 · 8 citations
  4. 4Need for transition medicine in pediatric surgery – health related quality of life in adolescents and young adults with congenital malformations2021 · 11 citations
  5. 5Prognostic accuracy of antenatal neonatology consultation2016 · 24 citations