Case report highlights distinct features and limitations of therapies for gastrointestinal stromal tumors with NTRK fusion.
Abstract Purpose This study aimed to characterize the clinicopathological, immunophenotypic, and molecular features of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) harboring NTRK fusions and to evaluate their diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic implications. Methods Twenty-six cases of KIT/PDGFRA/SDH/BRAF wild-type GISTs were evaluated using pan-TRK immunohistochemistry (IHC), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for *NTRK1/2/3*, and next-generation sequencing (NGS). Transcriptome analysis was performed on all NTRK fusion-positive cases. Seven KIT-mutant GISTs served as controls. Clinicopathological parameters, IHC profiles, genetic alterations, and treatment responses were analyzed, supplemented by a literature review. Results Five of the 26 wild-type GISTs harbored NTRK fusions, all confirmed by NGS as ETV6::NTRK3. Pan-TRK IHC showed 100% sensitivity and 66.7% specificity. All five patients were male; four tumors were intestinal and one gastric. Four cases were high-risk and one very low-risk. Two cases recurred post-resection, showing additional mutations and copy number variations (CNVs). Transcriptome analysis revealed molecular heterogeneity among NTRK fusion-positive GISTs, with profiles overlapping those of KIT-mutant GISTs. Both recurrent patients received multi-line TKI therapy (imatinib, sunitinib, regorafenib, ripretinib) with disease progression; one subsequently achieved remission with larotrectinib. Conclusion NTRK fusion-positive GISTs are rare and exhibit distinct clinicopathological characteristics. FISH and NGS are reliable detection methods, while pan-TRK IHC has limited specificity. Co-occurring genetic alterations may confer aggressive behavior. These tumors respond to TRK inhibition but are resistant to conventional TKIs, underscoring the need for molecularly guided therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: