Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Bioinformatics analysis reveals CLEC4E's prognostic value and its diagnostic performance in SLE patients, highlighting its potential role in disease assessment.
Objective This study explores the prognostic value of the CLEC4E gene in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) through bioinformatics analysis and evaluates its role in disease diagnosis and progression. Methods Gene expression datasets related to SLE (GSE17755, GSE50772, and GSE61635) were obtained from the GEO (Gene Expression Omnibus) database. Intersection analysis was performed using the Jvenn tool with a screening threshold of |log2FC| > 1 and P< 0.05 to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs). The resulting DEGs were then cross-referenced with immune-related genes in the GeneCards database (relevance score > 8) to further prioritize candidates with immunological relevance. Peripheral blood from 360 SLE patients and 360 healthy controls was collected for CLEC4E expression analysis via RT-qPCR. Disease activity was evaluated using the SLEDAI score, and patients were grouped accordingly. Pearson and Spearman correlation analysis to investigate the relationship between CLEC4E and immune indicators. Logistic regression and ROC analyses were conducted to assess diagnostic and prognostic value. Kaplan-Meier analysis evaluated survival outcomes. Results Bioinformatics analysis identified six SLE-related DEGs, namely ISG15 , HERC5 , TNFAIP6 , IFIT3 , OASL , and CLEC4E. Further intersection with immune-related genes from the GeneCards database (relevance score > 8) ultimately highlighted CLEC4E as the key gene for clinical validation. The expression level of CLEC4E was significantly higher in SLE patients compared with healthy controls. ROC analysis showed good diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.7744). CLEC4E expression was higher in active SLE, and multivariate analysis identified CLEC4E , C3, C4, ANA, and anti-dsDNA as independent predictors of disease activity. CLEC4E demonstrated moderate diagnostic value for distinguishing active from inactive disease (AUC = 0.6360). Higher CLEC4E expression was associated with worse prognosis ( P = 0.0002). The combined diagnostic performance with other biomarkers (C3, C4, ANA, anti-dsDNA) showed a remarkable AUC of 0.9407. Conclusion CLEC4E is a potential biomarker for SLE diagnosis, disease activity assessment, and prognosis evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: