This research examines anthropometric measurements and BMI in female handball players, indicating variations by playing positions.
Modern handball requires specialization of players by playing positions, which entails different demands on their physical parameters. Objective: To analyze and summarize both existing scientific data and our own findings regarding the body height, weight, and body mass index (BMI) of highly qualified female handball players, taking into account their playing positions. The study included both main and reserve players of the “Halychanka” handball team. Methods: Theoretical analysis, morphological methods, generalization of obtained data on BMI, height and weight, as well as methods of mathematical statistics. Results: The results showed that the BMI of all players was within the normal range, varying from 20.78 ± 1.22 kg/m² (left wings) to 24.37 ± 1.66 kg/m² (pivot). The lowest values of height and weight were recorded among left wing players (174.0 ± 3.94 cm; 63.3 ± 1.99 kg), while the highest were found among right wings and pivots. The Shapiro-Wilk test confirmed a normal distribution for most parameters (p > 0.05). Correlation analysis revealed a strong relationship between weight and BMI (p < 0.01), while other relationships between positions were weak and statistically insignificant. The results indicate individualization of morpho-functional characteristics depending on the playing role. Conclusions: The analysis of height, weight, and BMI by playing positions suggests that these parameters may vary depending on the player's individual characteristics, playing style, and other factors. Although all players’ BMI values fall within the normal range, differences in height and weight are observed, influenced by the specifics of each playing role. The highest BMI and weight values were found among pivots and goalkeepers, while the lowest were observed among wings. Most parameters were normally distributed (p > 0.05). Correlations between anthropometric indicators across playing positions did not reveal statistically significant differences, indicating a relative similarity of morphological characteristics within the team.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pavlyschyn et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: