Meta-theoretical framework resolves dualism in neuroscience, suggesting implications for the mind and therapy.
This paper presents the Resonance-Inference Model (RIM) as a meta-theoretical framework that overcomes the "explanatory gap" between the first-person perspective of experience and the third-person perspective of neuroscience. The central thesis is that the RIM resolves Cartesian dualism not through reduction but through a synergetic synthesis, modeling the mind as an emergent ordering parameter of the brain-body-environment loop. The model integrates the free energy principle (Friston), the phenomenology of the embodied self (Gallagher), and spatio-temporal brain dynamics (Northoff). A philosophical genealogy is drawn from Schopenhauer's anti-representationalist turn to modern enactivism (Thompson), and a mediating proposal between enactivism and predictive processing is offered. The paper also subjects the model to a stress test by addressing and integratively resolving key limit questions (e.g., on the nature of consciousness and the universality of the search for meaning). The implications for a non-reductionist, integrative science of the mind, as well as for the clinical practice of psychotherapy, are outlined.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gerd Leidig (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: