Qualitative analysis reveals the successful peace agreement between Iran and Saudi Arabia, highlighting China's mediation role.
Ever since the Iranian Revolution (1979), Iran and Saudi Arabia have tussled for regional dominance. Their competition defines the Middle Eastern conflict dynamics, for the region’s many armed conflicts–Yemen, Iraq, Syria, and Lebanon–have become their battleground. The two sides broke diplomatic relations in 2016. Whereas the past attempts at cooling down the conflict failed, China successfully mediated a tripartite peace agreement on 10th March 2023 between Iran and Saudi Arabia. The paper employed the Ripeness theory of conflict resolution to explain the successful rapprochement. By applying qualitative research methodology, it is argued that decision-makers in Tehran and Riyadh perceived a mutually imminent catastrophe (IMC). This, together with systemic factors, ripened the conflict for resolution. Lastly, it is argued that China’s mediation was motivated by its ambition to regain its historical role and hence, not meant to challenge the United States.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khurshid et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: