In this paper, colleagues from the University of the Arts London shared insights regarding how they were, first, using data to adapt their offers to enhance students’ learning experiences and outcomes and, second, developing a data approach to examine impact and share evidence for further change. The London College of Fashion learning development department has access to institutional grade, retention and continuation data, and survey responses. However, this high-level data can be challenging to examine for feedback on practice and for innovation. In response, the presenters of this session have evolved an approach of stitching together a patchwork of institutional data with finer-grained exploration of students’ formal and informal feedback relating to their experiences within the College. Particularly useful has been listening to students’ perceptions shared through learning conversations and interactions, sessions with Changemakers and during collaborations when trialling new ideas. In turn, those involved in the initiative pieced together qualitative insights with analysis of a range of institutional data within a situated perspective of students’ learning and research in the field to create theories of change to enhance students’ outcomes and experiences (Thomas & Jones, 2017; Snoussi & Mompelat, 2018; UUK, 2019; HEPI, 2023; TASO, 2024). These include higher attainment, students’ greater belief in their efforts and increased connectedness of lecturers and students in the College. A challenge has been gathering varied data to infer in detail how the adaptations to practice influence equity, inclusivity and success within the contexts they are operationalised within. The session shared some collective conceptual and technical developments and challenges for the practical implementation of a data infrastructure to enhance our understanding and inform how evidence is shared for improved student experiences and outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shackleton et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: