Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Comparison shows MysteryMaster reduces unclassified reads in nanopore sequencing data, suggesting improved accuracy.
Background The high error rate associated with Oxford Nanopore sequencing technology adversely affects demultiplexing. To improve demultiplexing and reduce unclassified reads from nanopore sequencing data, we developed MysteryMaster , a demultiplexer that utilizes the optimal sequence aligner, Cola. Results When compared to Oxford Nanopore´s Dorado and Guppy demultiplexing tools across three datasets of 37 diverse samples with established ground truth, we found that MysteryMaster accurately identifies a similar or greater percentage of reads among the different basecalling models: Fast, HAC, and SUP. MysteryMaster performs slightly better than the other tools on data that was basecalled using the Fast basecalled model, while its performance in HAC and SUP data is similar to Dorado’s. MysteryMaster has a false positive rate of just 0.41% with default settings. Conclusions While MysteryMaster can function as a standalone demultiplexer tool, the sequential application of Dorado and MysteryMaster produced the best overall performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khezri et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: