Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates a new tool, Barbell, which improves demultiplexing efficiency in Nanopore sequencing, suggesting significant benefits for data accuracy.
Motivation Oxford Nanopore sequencing enables long-read analysis for diverse applications, but artefacts introduced by Nanopore barcoding are poorly characterized and can compromise demultiplexing accuracy and downstream analyses. Results Using a rapid barcoding experiment on 66 diagnostic samples, we found that only 83% of reads followed the expected single-barcode configuration, while 17% showed complex barcode attachments. We observed similar patterns in public datasets, and also in native barcoding datasets where only 30%–70% of the reads had barcodes on both ends. Widely used demultiplexers, including Dorado, fail to resolve these cases, leaving ∼10% of our rapid barcoding reads partially trimmed and contaminated with adapter fragments. We developed Barbell, a pattern-aware demultiplexer that is designed to detect complex barcode configurations. Barbell reduced contaminated reads from >400 000 (Dorado/Flexiplex) to 166 (99.96% reduction), minimized barcode bleeding, and supports custom experimental designs such as dual-end barcodes and shorter barcodes (e.g. Illumina barcodes). We further show that such contamination is widespread in public databases, with Nanopore sequences detected in hundreds of NCBI entries, some of which are responsible for artificial taxonomic connections. Availability and implementation Barbell is open source and available at https://github.com/rickbeeloo/barbell.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beeloo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: