This framework combines PCA and PMF for accurate groundwater pollution identification, highlighting agricultural and industrial contributions.
This study develops an integrated framework for groundwater pollution source identification by coupling Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF), and the Mantel test, with the Qujiang River Basin as a case study. The framework enables a full-process assessment, encompassing qualitative identification, quantitative apportionment, and spatial validation of pollution drivers. Results indicate that groundwater chemistry is primarily influenced by three categories of sources: natural rock weathering, agricultural and domestic activities, and industrial wastewater discharge. Anthropogenic sources account for 73.7% of the total contribution, with mixed agricultural and domestic inputs dominating (38.5%), followed by industrial effluents (35.2%), while natural weathering contributes 26.3%. Mantel test analysis further shows that agricultural and domestic pollution correlates strongly with intensive farmland distribution in the midstream area, natural sources correspond to carbonate outcrops and higher elevations in the upstream, and industrial contributions cluster in downstream industrial zones. By integrating PCA, PMF, and Mantel analysis, this study offers a robust and transferable framework that improves both the accuracy and spatial interpretability of groundwater pollution source identification. The proposed approach provides scientific support for regionalized groundwater pollution prevention and control under complex hydrogeological settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: