Apportioning pollution sources under compound pollution conditions is challenging in river pollution source analysis. The positive matrix factorization (PMF) model is widely used to analyze river pollution sources. However, the identification of pollutants in this model relies primarily on the subjective experience of the researchers, leading to ineffective identification of different contaminants from similar sources. In this study, we propose a comprehensive deviation index (CDI) to quantitatively identify pollution source types based on the PMF and observed source profiles. Taking the subtropical Xizhijiang River Basin as a case study, we quantitatively identified the pollution sources and their contributions to dissolved organic carbon (DOC), total nitrogen (TN), and total phosphorus (TP) using observed water quality and pollution sources data. The results showed that the eight major pollutants in the study region exhibited significant positive correlations, indicating the similarity of pollutant sources in the watershed. The PMF model identified three primary pollution sources with coefficients of determination for observed versus predicted concentrations ranging from 0.60 to 0.98. The CDI unveiled that the watershed's three pollution sources were farmland, rural, and wastewater treatment plants (WTPs). Farmland emerges as the predominant contributor to DOC (68.04 %), TC (63.29 %), and TDP (44.51 %). Rural notably contributes to NH
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sheng et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: