What type of study is this?

This is a Systematic Review study (also classified as: Content Analysis).

A systematic analysis of secondary school physics curriculum comparison across countries

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Findings reveal key differences in curriculum flexibility, with developed countries favoring adaptive models and developing countries adopting rigid structures.
Analysis of 25 indexed articles showcases global trends in pedagogical approaches, highlighting the role of technology and contextual integration.
This systematic review utilized the PRISMA framework to conduct comparative and content analysis across numerous countries.
The research emphasizes the need for Indonesia to adopt a more flexible and technologically innovative physics curriculum to enhance student outcomes.

Authors

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Systematic review analyzes physics curriculum structures in developed and developing countries, indicating a shift towards inquiry-based learning.

Zahara et al. (2025) studied this question.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Systematic review analyzes physics curriculum structures in developed and developing countries, indicating a shift towards inquiry-based learning.