Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This evaluation framework identifies key criteria for building performance assessment, suggesting improvements for urban planning in Jakarta.
A building is considered ready for use once it obtains a Certificate of Occupancy, which serves as a regulatory mechanism for overseeing building activities. To measure the quality level achieved in a completed building project, numerous assessment tools and methods have been developed globally to measure building performance. This study aims to create an evaluation system based on a scoring methodology. To develop the framework, seven prominent building assessment methods were analyzed, focusing on their application processes, primary criteria, and sub-criteria. Surveys were conducted involving construction experts and respondents familiar with quality and feasibility building assessment to incorporate their insights into the local construction context of Jakarta. The genetic algorithm method was used to analyze the survey data, leading to the identification of 12 criteria and 39 sub-criteria as the most suitable for assessing the implementation of the Certificate of Occupancy in Jakarta. These criteria include structural integrity (5%), fire safety (20%), mechanical, electrical, and plumbing (MEP) systems (8%), accessibility (8%), drainage systems and waste management (5%), functionality testing (8%), environmental quality (6%), sociocultural and functional aspects (8%), technical quality (8%), construction area quality (8%), energy consumption (8%), and health-related building requirements (8%).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Prasetyo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: