Cross-sectional analysis reveals significant links between lifestyle factors and diabetes risk in workers, suggesting implications for health strategies.
Background: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a global health concern driven by aging, lifestyle, and socio-economic disparities. Early detection is key, with tools like FINDRISC, QDScore, and CANRISK providing non-invasive screening. Yet, the combined effects of sociodemographic factors, healthy habits, and perceived quality of life on diabetes risk remain insufficiently studied in working populations. Objectives: To evaluate the association between sociodemographic variables, lifestyle habits (smoking, physical activity, adherence to the Mediterranean diet), and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) with the risk of developing type 2 diabetes, using three validated screening tools in a large cohort of Spanish workers. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 100,014 Spanish workers aged 18 to 69 years who underwent standardized medical evaluations between January 2021 and December 2023. Diabetes risk was assessed using the FINDRISC, QDScore, and CANRISK tools. Lifestyle variables and HRQoL (measured via the SF-12 questionnaire) were evaluated through validated instruments. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to examine the association of independent variables with moderate-to-high diabetes risk according to each score. Results: Among the strongest predictors, poor adherence to a Mediterranean diet (OR = 1.45, 95% CI: 1.32–1.58) and low physical activity (OR = 1.39, 95% CI: 1.27–1.52) were independently associated with higher diabetes risk. Poor HRQoL was also significant (OR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.22–1.47). Conclusions: Sociodemographic factors, lifestyle behaviors, and perceived health status are independently associated with increased type 2 diabetes risk in Spanish workers. The integration of HRQoL assessments into occupational health surveillance may enhance early identification of at-risk individuals and guide tailored prevention strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jansana et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: