PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 5, 2025Leukemia & lymphoma/Leukemia and lymphoma3 citationsOpen Access

Real-world treatment adherence and persistence of FLT3 inhibitors as post-alloHCT maintenance therapy in patients with AML in the United States: a cohort study using administrative claims data

View Full Paper
VKVanessa E. KennedyMTMaëlys TouyaJSJames Spalding

Key Points

  • Higher adherence observed in AML patients with a history of relapsed/refractory disease before alloHCT.
  • Discontinuation risk was significantly higher for midostaurin and sorafenib compared to gilteritinib.
  • Data from 162 AML patients with alloHCT showed varying persistence rates in post-alloHCT treatment.
  • No significant differences in post-alloHCT relapse were found based on adherence metrics in this population.

Abstract

In FLT3-mutated (FLT3mut+) acute myeloid leukemia (AML), relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) is the leading cause of treatment failure and mortality. We evaluated real-world adherence and persistence of FLT3-like–tyrosine kinase inhibitors as alloHCT maintenance in FLT3mut+ AML. Claims data were extracted from adults with AML with ≥1 alloHCT between January 2016 and June 2022 who received gilteritinib, midostaurin, or sorafenib as post-alloHCT maintenance. Adherence (PDC; days covered ≥80% during follow-up) and persistence (days receiving treatment without switch/gap >60 days) were assessed. Of 162 patients, 41, 53, and 68 received post-alloHCT gilteritinib, midostaurin, or sorafenib, respectively. Adherence was higher in patients with a history of relapsed/refractory disease before alloHCT (n = 106 65.4%, p = .021). Although this study did not focus on outcomes, no significant differences in post-alloHCT relapse by PDC were found. Discontinuation risk was higher for midostaurin (HR = 2.79, p = .0005) and sorafenib (HR = 1.74, p = .046) versus gilteritinib in patients with Commercial insurance vs Medicare/Medicaid (HR = 1.68, p = .019).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kennedy et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e24e60d6d66a53c24732b9https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2025.2561737
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper