We explore how the asymptotic structure of a random permutation of $[n]$ with m inversions evolves, as m increases, establishing thresholds for the appearance and disappearance of any classical, consecutive or vincular pattern. The threshold for the appearance of a classical pattern depends on the greatest number of inversions in any of its sum indecomposable components.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bevan et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: