Simulation study demonstrates non-flow contributions to elliptic flow across quark flavors in proton-proton collisions, highlighting the need for background subtraction in experimental analyses.
This manuscript reports on the elliptic flow parameter, v₂, in proton-proton (p-p) collisions using PYTHIA8 event generator simulations. The typical Event Plane ($EP$) method v₂($EP$) as the one used for the real data analysis has been adopted to measure the v₂ of particles composed of different quark flavors, and produced at mid-pseudorapidity |η| ≤ 1 at center-of-mass energy √s = 200 GeV and √s = 13 TeV. The event plane has been constructed using the soft charged particles with transverse momentum (pT < 2 GeV/c) produced in various η ranges. The pseudorapidity gap technique (Δη) between the particle of interest and the soft charged particles contributed to the event plane constructions has been utilized to benchmark the non-flow contributions. The v₂^π^±,π⁰, v₂J/ψ,Υ, K, D, B, and the v₂^γdir show similar pattern dependence on the transverse momentum for the same Δη, at both √s = 200 GeV and √s = 13 TeV. At each center-of-mass energy, the measured v₂ shows obvious dependence on the quark flavor contents where v₂^γdir ≤ v₂J/ψ, Υ, K, D, B ≤ v₂^π^±,π⁰ for similar Δη gap. The measured v₂ shows slightly higher values at smaller √s for particles of similar values of Δη gaps, particularly at small Δη gap. The measured v₂ for all particles shows systematic decreases with increasing the Δη gap as expected from the previous experimental results. Because PYTHIA8 simulations do not incorporate final state interactions, the v₂(EP) values reported here primarily reflect the non-flow contributions and its dependence on the quark contents, pseudorapidity gap as a function on pT at each center of mass-energy. These contributions should be carefully subtracted from the signal in real data analysis that employs the same event plane determination algorithm.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abdulhamid et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: