Simulation demonstrates non-flow contributions to the elliptic flow parameter across particle species in proton-proton collisions, highlighting the need for signal baseline subtraction.
This manuscript reports on the elliptic flow parameter, v₂, in proton-proton (p-p) collisions using PYTHIA8 event generator simulations. The typical Event Plane (EP) method v₂(EP) besides the algorithm used for the real data analysis has been adopted to measure the v₂ of particles composed of different quark flavors. The v₂ of the aforementioned particles was measured at the center of mass energy √S_NN = 200 GeV and √S_NN = 13 TeV. The pseudorapidity gap techniques, theoretically defined as |Δη| = |η_particle - η_EP|, between the particle of interest and the soft particles, p_ₜ ≤ 2 GeV/c, used for the event plane determinations, have been implemented in the current measurements. The v₂^π^±,π⁰, v₂J/ψ,Υ, K, D, B, and the v₂^γdir show similar pattern dependence on the transverse momentum for the same |Δη|, at both √S_NN = 200 GeV and √S_NN = 13 TeV. At each center-of-mass energy, the v₂^γdir ≤ v₂J/ψ, Υ, K, D, B ≤ v₂^π^±,π⁰ for similar |Δη|. The measured v₂ shows slightly higher values at smaller √S_NN for particles of similar |Δη|, particularly at small |Δη|. The measured v₂ for all particles shows systematic decreases with increasing the |Δη| gaps as expected. Since PYTHIA8 does not include final state interactions, the reported v₂(EP) is mainly due to the non-flow contributions which should be subtracted from the signal in the real data analysis that uses the same event plane determination algorithm.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abdulhamid et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: