Analyzing <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:msup><a:mi>e</a:mi><a:mo>+</a:mo></a:msup><a:msup><a:mi>e</a:mi><a:mo>−</a:mo></a:msup></a:math> collision data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><c:mn>7.33</c:mn><c:mtext> </c:mtext><c:mtext> </c:mtext><c:msup><c:mi>fb</c:mi><c:mrow><c:mo>−</c:mo><c:mn>1</c:mn></c:mrow></c:msup></c:math> collected at center-of-mass energies between 4.128 and 4.226 GeV with the BESIII detector, we measure the branching fraction of the semileptonic decay <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><e:msubsup><e:mi>D</e:mi><e:mi>s</e:mi><e:mo>+</e:mo></e:msubsup><e:mo stretchy="false">→</e:mo><e:msup><e:mi>K</e:mi><e:mn>0</e:mn></e:msup><e:msup><e:mi>e</e:mi><e:mo>+</e:mo></e:msup><e:msub><e:mi>ν</e:mi><e:mi>e</e:mi></e:msub></e:math> to be <h:math xmlns:h="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><h:mo stretchy="false">(</h:mo><h:mn>2.98</h:mn><h:mo>±</h:mo><h:mn>0.2</h:mn><h:msub><h:mn>3</h:mn><h:mrow><h:mi>stat</h:mi></h:mrow></h:msub><h:mo>±</h:mo><h:mn>0.1</h:mn><h:msub><h:mn>2</h:mn><h:mrow><h:mi>syst</h:mi></h:mrow></h:msub><h:mo stretchy="false">)</h:mo><h:mo>×</h:mo><h:msup><h:mn>10</h:mn><h:mrow><h:mo>−</h:mo><h:mn>3</h:mn></h:mrow></h:msup></h:math>. Based on fit to the partial decay rates in various <l:math xmlns:l="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><l:msup><l:mi>q</l:mi><l:mn>2</l:mn></l:msup></l:math> intervals, the product value of <n:math xmlns:n="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><n:msubsup><n:mi>D</n:mi><n:mi>s</n:mi><n:mo>+</n:mo></n:msubsup><n:mo stretchy="false">→</n:mo><n:msup><n:mi>K</n:mi><n:mn>0</n:mn></n:msup></n:math> hadronic form factor and Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa element is measured to be <q:math xmlns:q="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><q:msubsup><q:mi>f</q:mi><q:mo>+</q:mo><q:msup><q:mi>K</q:mi><q:mn>0</q:mn></q:msup></q:msubsup><q:mo stretchy="false">(</q:mo><q:mn>0</q:mn><q:mo stretchy="false">)</q:mo><q:mo stretchy="false">|</q:mo><q:msub><q:mi>V</q:mi><q:mrow><q:mi>c</q:mi><q:mi>d</q:mi></q:mrow></q:msub><q:mo stretchy="false">|</q:mo><q:mo>=</q:mo><q:mn>0.143</q:mn><q:mo>±</q:mo><q:mn>0.01</q:mn><q:msub><q:mn>1</q:mn><q:mrow><q:mi>stat</q:mi></q:mrow></q:msub><q:mo>±</q:mo><q:mn>0.00</q:mn><q:msub><q:mn>3</q:mn><q:mrow><q:mi>syst</q:mi></q:mrow></q:msub></q:math>. With <w:math xmlns:w="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><w:mo stretchy="false">|</w:mo><w:msub><w:mi>V</w:mi><w:mrow><w:mi>c</w:mi><w:mi>d</w:mi></w:mrow></w:msub><w:mo stretchy="false">|</w:mo><w:mo>=</w:mo><w:mn>0.22486</w:mn><w:mo>±</w:mo><w:mn>0.00067</w:mn></w:math> as an input, the hadronic form factor is evaluated to be <ab:math xmlns:ab="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><ab:msubsup><ab:mi>f</ab:mi><ab:mo>+</ab:mo><ab:msup><ab:mi>K</ab:mi><ab:mn>0</ab:mn></ab:msup></ab:msubsup><ab:mo stretchy="false">(</ab:mo><ab:mn>0</ab:mn><ab:mo stretchy="false">)</ab:mo><ab:mo>=</ab:mo><ab:mn>0.636</ab:mn><ab:mo>±</ab:mo><ab:mn>0.04</ab:mn><ab:msub><ab:mn>9</ab:mn><ab:mrow><ab:mi>stat</ab:mi></ab:mrow></ab:msub><ab:mo>±</ab:mo><ab:mn>0.01</ab:mn><ab:msub><ab:mn>3</ab:mn><ab:mrow><ab:mi>syst</ab:mi></ab:mrow></ab:msub></ab:math>. The branching fraction and form factor measurements are factors of 1.6 and 1.7 more precise than the previous world averages, respectively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ablikim et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: