Clinical review demonstrates the role of geriatric assessment in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia, highlighting fitness criteria to balance intensive chemotherapy risks.
Assessing the suitability of older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) to intensive chemotherapy or stem cell transplantation remains a long-standing challenge. Geriatric assessment, which evaluates multiple dimensions of health, may influence a patient's ability to tolerate intensive or mild intensity approach, including treatment related mortality. Prospective studies are needed to validate different fitness criteria as well as to compare the effectiveness of geriatric assessment–based fitness against other criteria, in order to identify which aspects of the geriatric assessment are linked to treatment tolerance. Hopefully, validation studies should include different group of patients receiving either intensive or lower-intensity chemotherapy. At a minimum, the geriatric assessment should measure comorbidity burden, cognition, physical function, and emotional health—factors previously associated with mortality in AML. These assessments should be conducted before starting chemotherapy in order to minimize the treatment's impact on the results. While treatment tolerance has traditionally been evaluated through toxicity rates in solid tumor patients, AML treatment often results in high toxicity rates regardless of intensity. Therefore, early mortality should be the primary endpoint for assessing treatment tolerance, given its significant and clear implications. Other important endpoints might include declines in functional status, quality of life, and treatment adjustments or discontinuation due to toxicities. Validating these fitness criteria is essential for guiding treatment choices, improving supportive care, determining trial eligibility, interpreting study outcomes, and informing drug labeling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Molica et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: