The main purpose of this study is to conduct an in-depth analysis of the influence of moderation and mediation of perception of special material support in the context of factors affecting innovation performance in the West Kalimantan Police. This research aims to identify and evaluate how variables such as innovative leadership, organizational values, and readiness for change interact and contribute to innovation performance. This study uses a quantitative approach using Structural Equation Modeling - Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS) as the main analysis tool. The population of this study includes 3,118 personnel, with a sample of 512 respondents selected through stratified cluster random sampling. The results of this study reveal several important findings. First, innovative leadership has been shown to have a significant positive influence on organizational values and indirectly affects readiness to change, perception of special material tool support, and innovation performance. Second, organizational values are identified as the dominant variable that affects the innovation performance of members, either directly or indirectly through other variables. Third, readiness to change and the perception of the support of special material tools play an important mediator in the relationship between innovative leadership and innovation performance. The implications of these findings are quite broad, covering theoretical aspects in the development of organizational and management theory, managerial implications related to leadership strategies and organizational culture, and policy implications, especially in the context of policing. However, this research has limitations, especially in the context of its application to organizations with a different structure from police institutions. In addition, the specificity of the leadership role in the hierarchical structure of the National Police is also a factor that limits the generalization of these findings to the context of other organizations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Satriadi et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: