Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective: To demonstrate the feasibility and efficacy of a new video-observation training method (intensive visual simulation) to improve upper limb function. Design: Small sample, randomized, evaluator-blind, monocentric study. Patients: Seventeen early subacute ischaemic stroke patients with complete hemiplegia were randomly assigned to the therapeutic group (n = 8) or control group (CG, n = 9). Methods: Thirty sessions of intensive visual simulation combined with corrected visual feedback (therapeutic group) or uncorrected visual feedback (control group) were performed over 6 weeks on top of a standard rehabilitation programme. Main outcome measure: 400-point hand assessment test (400p-HA). Secondary outcome measures: Box and Blocks (B&B), Purdue Pegboard test, Minnesota. Results: The 400p-HA test improved significantly from T0 to 6 months for both groups, with a significant difference between groups at 3 months (MW-UT p = 0.046) and 4 months (MW-UT p = 0.046) in favour of the therapeutic group. One-phase exponential modelling of 400p-HA showed a greater plateau for the therapeutic group (F test p = 0.0021). There was also faster recovery of the ability to perform the B&B tests for the therapeutic group (log-rank test p = 0.03). Conclusion: This study demonstrated the feasibility and potential efficacy of an intensive visual simulation training programme to improve upper limb function in subacute stroke patients. A larger study is needed to confirm these results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ojardias et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: