Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study was designed to investigate the effects of individual, dyadic, and collaborative planning on moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA; primary outcome) and energy-dense food intake (secondary outcome) in dyads of parents and their 9-15-year-old children. Individual planning reflects an "I-for-me" planning of one person's behavior. Collaborative ("we-for-us") planning refers to joint planning of both dyad members' behavior, whereas dyadic ("we-for-me") planning involves joint planning of only the target person's behavior.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kuliś et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: