Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article argues that a phenomenological notion of “lived body” emerges in the Zhuangzi ’s 莊子 critique of the Confucian body of ritual and morality. It also argues that a philosophical account of body cannot be reduced to a Sinological account. This article draws on the phenomenological distinction between “object body” and “lived body,” especially the “three ontological dimensions” of Jean-Paul Sartre to argue that the Zhuangzi criticizes the Confucian body of ritual and morality as being a “body-for-others” and that it maintains a concept of “lived body.” Finally, it argues that through such methods of cultivation as “sitting and forgetting” a liberation of the body is achieved where one is connected to dao 道 and achieves a state of heightened experience.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kevin J. Turner (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: