This analysis reveals Zhuangzi's dream concept deconstructs pragmatic views, suggesting existential equality in states of being.
This paper argues that the Zhuangzi's famous dream passages are not merely literary devices or skeptical tools, but the foundation of a coherent philosophical project dismantling the pragmatic, utilitarian worldview. This knowledge-application (zhi-yong 知—用) system, which reduces all value to function, rests on the unexamined assumption that our awakeness possesses a monopoly on reality. Zhuangzi attacks this foundation directly through philosophy of dream. By grounding the dream's transformative power in the metaphysics of qi 氣 and establishing an existential parity between dreaming and waking, he reveals our waking certainty to be a 'Great Dream' built on the biases of chengxin 成心. The iconic butterfly dream thus becomes an experiential gateway to new realms of co-existence and no-self. This framework ultimately resolves the apparent contradiction of the 'dreamless True Person', who represents not a rejection of the dream, but the successful culmination of its deconstructive power.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guanghe Li (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: