Workplace bullying (WB) assessment often relies on the Negative Acts Questionnaire-Revised (NAQ-R). This study aimed to shorten and improve the NAQ-R using Item Response Theory (IRT) and address sex bias. IRT analysis from 867 Swedish employees (66% women) identified less-informative items. Based on this, a 13-item NAQ-R Short Form (NAQ-R-SF) was developed, demonstrating strong discrimination and validity. The new NAQ-R-SF showed a significant correlation with a primary WB measure (r = .57) and other relevant constructs, including individual factors like neuroticism and health quality, as well as work-related factors such as interpersonal conflicts and work performance. Sex bias was not found. IRT and validity evidence support the NAQ-R-SF as a robust tool for measuring WB, aligning with established WB constructs and individual differences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dåderman et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: