Reliable (±(1–2)%) estimates of stellar masses have typically been obtained from eclipsing binaries. In such cases, derived values of radii and T eff are in many cases discrepant relative to standard models, especially in active stars. These discrepancies led to the development of magneto-convection theory. Recently, an independent technique has emerged for determining precise masses of radio-emitting binary components: interferometric observations at multiple points around the orbit. S. Curiel et al. have used this technique to determine the masses of both components of an M8+M9 binary (LP349-25AB) with remarkably high precision: ±0.7%. However, applying standard models suggests that the components are not co-eval, differing in age by ∼30%. But LP349-25 is such a close binary (with a separation of 1.2 au) that non-coevality seems unrealistic. Here, we report on magneto-convective modeling which resolves the apparent non-coevality while simultaneously explaining why the primary component is variable, but the secondary component is not.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
MacDonald et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: