Introduction Kawasaki disease (KD) is a pediatric vasculitis that can result in coronary artery aneurysm (CAA) formation, which is a dangerous complication. Treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) significantly decreases the risk of CAA, possibly through competitive binding to Fc-gamma receptors (Fc γ Rs), which reduces the binding of pathological immune complexes. However, ~20% of children have recrudescence of fever and have an increased risk of CAA. Therefore, we aimed to identify genetic markers at the FCGR2/3 locus associated with susceptibility to KD, IVIg resistance, or CAA. Materials and methods We investigated the association of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and copy number variations (CNVs) at the FCGR2/3 locus with KD susceptibility, IVIg resistance, and CAA risk using a family-based test (KD susceptibility) and case–control analyses (IVIg resistance and CAA risk) in different cohorts, adding up to a total of 1,167 KD cases. We performed a meta-analysis on IVIg resistance and CAA risk including all cohorts supplemented by previous studies identified through a systematic search. Results FCGR2A- p.166His was confirmed to be strongly associated with KD susceptibility (Z = 3.17, p = 0.0015). In case–control analyses, all of the investigated genetic variations at the FCGR2/3 locus were generally not associated with IVIg resistance or with CAA risk, apart from a possible association in a Polish cohort for the FCGR3B- NA2 haplotype (OR = 2.15, 95% CI = 1.15–4.01, p = 0.02). Meta-analyses of all available cohorts revealed no significant associations of the FCGR2/3 locus with IVIg resistance or CAA risk. Discussion FCGR2/3 polymorphisms are associated with susceptibility to KD but not with IVIg resistance and CAA formation. Currently known genetic variations at the FCGR2/3 locus are not useful in prediction models for IVIg resistance or CAA risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Uittenbogaard et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: