Preclinical study demonstrates dual CDK4/6 and MEK inhibition triggers tumor regression in MPNST models, highlighting therapeutic potential for anti-PD-L1 combinations.
Abstract Purpose: Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) are lethal, Ras-driven sarcomas that lack effective therapies. We investigated effects of targeting CDK4/6, MEK, and/or programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) in preclinical MPNST models. Experimental Design: Patient-matched MPNSTs and precursor lesions were examined by FISH, RNAseq, IHC, and Connectivity-Map analyses. Antitumor activity of CDK4/6 and MEK inhibitors was measured in MPNST cell lines, patient-derived xenografts (PDXs), and de novo mouse MPNSTs, with the latter used to determine anti-PD-L1 response. Results: Patient tumor analyses identified CDK4/6 and MEK as actionable targets for MPNST therapy. Low-dose combinations of CDK4/6 and MEK inhibitors synergistically reactivated the retinoblastoma (RB1) tumor suppressor, induced cell death, and decreased clonogenic survival of MPNST cells. In immune-deficient mice, dual CDK4/6-MEK inhibition slowed tumor growth in 4 of 5 MPNST PDXs. In immunocompetent mice, combination therapy of de novo MPNSTs caused tumor regression, delayed resistant tumor outgrowth, and improved survival relative to monotherapies. Drug-sensitive tumors that regressed contained plasma cells and increased cytotoxic T cells, whereas drug-resistant tumors adopted an immunosuppressive microenvironment with elevated MHC II-low macrophages and increased tumor cell PD-L1 expression. Excitingly, CDK4/6-MEK inhibition sensitized MPNSTs to anti-PD-L1 immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) with some mice showing complete tumor regression. Conclusions: CDK4/6-MEK inhibition induces a novel plasma cell-associated immune response and extended antitumor activity in MPNSTs, which dramatically enhances anti-PD-L1 therapy. These preclinical findings provide strong rationale for clinical translation of CDK4/6-MEK-ICB targeted therapies in MPNST as they may yield sustained antitumor responses and improved patient outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kohlmeyer et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: