Purpose: To investigate the anesthetic efficacy of various concentrations of ropivacaine in ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block surgery in the inter-costoclavicular space. Methods: 94 patients for brachial plexus block surgery identified from March 2021 to March 2023 in Jilin Province, China were selected as the study subjects; they were divided into control group and study group, and the control group received 0.3% ropivacaine 20 ml while the study group received 20 ml of 0.4% ropivacaine. The nerve block efficiency, secondary evaluation index, VAS scores at 12 h, 24 h and 48 h after surgery and the occurrence of adverse reactions were determined. Results: There was no notable difference in the success rate of nerve block between the control and study group (91.49 % vs 95.74 %, χ2 = 0.712, p = 0.399). In comparison to control, the study group exhibited no noteworthy variance in the commencement time of the sensory block, whereas the remaining three indicators were significantly shortened (p < 0.05). The VAS scores at 12 and 24 h after surgery were markedly lower compared to the control (p < 0.05), while at 48 h, VAS scores were slightly lower (p > 0.05). There was no significant disparity in the overall incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups (4.26 vs. 6.38 %), neither were there serious complications such as tube nerve injury, local anesthetic poisoning, Horner's syndrome, pneumothorax, and postoperative sensory-motor abnormalities (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Using 0.4 % ropivacaine in ultrasound-guided intercostal brachial plexus block surgery achieves a higher success rate, enhances nerve block onset and duration, and improves postoperative pain relief, all without raising the incidence of adverse reactions, when compared to the use of 0.3 % ropivacaine concentration. However, larger clinical trials are required before the application of this strategy in clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shen et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: