Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective: As technology advances and allows for even more efficiency and precision, it is anticipated that robot-assisted spine surgery will become more and more prevalent in the future. In the realm of spine surgery, we discuss our preliminary experiences with the Excelsius GPS® spine surgical robot and its role in improving patient safety. Methods: At our facility, 150 patients had robot-assisted Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF). The demographic information, radiation exposure, cranial facet joint violation, and pedicle screw accuracy were assessed. Pedicle screw accuracy was evaluated using the Gertzbein-Robbins classification, whereas facet joint violation was evaluated using the Yson classification. Results: 150 patients received robotic help for the placement of 696 screws in all. With robotic aid, we discovered the accuracy to be 98.27% and facet joint violation rates of 17% & 0% for grades 1 & 2 respectively. Radiation exposure for patients was significantly higher than that of healthcare personnel, (10.57±3.605 vs 1.35±0.425 mSv P<0.00001). Conclusion: Robotic spine surgery may reduce human error—such as tremors and fatigue—that may occur during traditional open spine procedures. Robotic surgery offers three-dimensional views and navigation technology and may be used to improve accuracy, lower issues, and raise patient safety.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Puneet Girdhar (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: