This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
We compute the <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:mover accent="true"><a:mi>h</a:mi><a:mo stretchy="false">¯</a:mo></a:mover><a:mi>c</a:mi></a:math> (pseudo)scalar, (axial-)vector and (axial-)tensor susceptibilities as a function of <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><e:mrow><e:mi>u</e:mi><e:mo>=</e:mo><e:msub><e:mrow><e:mi>m</e:mi></e:mrow><e:mrow><e:mi>c</e:mi></e:mrow></e:msub><e:mo>/</e:mo><e:msub><e:mrow><e:mi>m</e:mi></e:mrow><e:mrow><e:mi>h</e:mi></e:mrow></e:msub></e:mrow></e:math> between <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><g:mi>u</g:mi><g:mo>=</g:mo><g:msub><g:mi>m</g:mi><g:mi>c</g:mi></g:msub><g:mo>/</g:mo><g:msub><g:mi>m</g:mi><g:mi>b</g:mi></g:msub></g:math> and <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><i:mi>u</i:mi><i:mo>=</i:mo><i:mn>0.8</i:mn></i:math> using fully relativistic lattice QCD, employing nonperturbative current renormalization and using the second generation <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><k:mn>2</k:mn><k:mo>+</k:mo><k:mn>1</k:mn><k:mo>+</k:mo><k:mn>1</k:mn></k:math> MILC HISQ gluon field configurations. We include ensembles with <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><m:mi>a</m:mi><m:mo>≈</m:mo><m:mn>0.09</m:mn></m:math>, 0.06, 0.045, and 0.033 fm and we are able to reach the physical <o:math xmlns:o="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><o:mi>b</o:mi></o:math>-quark on the two finest ensembles. At the physical <q:math xmlns:q="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><q:msub><q:mi>m</q:mi><q:mi>h</q:mi></q:msub><q:mo>=</q:mo><q:msub><q:mi>m</q:mi><q:mi>b</q:mi></q:msub></q:math> point we find <s:math xmlns:s="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><s:mrow><s:msubsup><s:mrow><s:mover accent="true"><s:mrow><s:mi>m</s:mi></s:mrow><s:mrow><s:mo stretchy="true">¯</s:mo></s:mrow></s:mover></s:mrow><s:mrow><s:mi>b</s:mi></s:mrow><s:mrow><s:mn>2</s:mn></s:mrow></s:msubsup><s:msub><s:mrow><s:mi>χ</s:mi></s:mrow><s:mrow><s:msup><s:mrow><s:mn>1</s:mn></s:mrow><s:mrow><s:mo>+</s:mo></s:mrow></s:msup></s:mrow></s:msub><s:mo>=</s:mo><s:mspace linebreak="goodbreak"/><s:mn>0.720</s:mn><s:mo stretchy="false">(</s:mo><s:mn>34</s:mn><s:mo stretchy="false">)</s:mo><s:mo>×</s:mo><s:msup><s:mrow><s:mn>10</s:mn></s:mrow><s:mrow><s:mo>−</s:mo><s:mn>2</s:mn></s:mrow></s:msup></s:mrow></s:math>, <z:math xmlns:z="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><z:mrow><z:msubsup><z:mrow><z:mover accent="true"><z:mrow><z:mi>m</z:mi></z:mrow><z:mrow><z:mo stretchy="true">¯</z:mo></z:mrow></z:mover></z:mrow><z:mrow><z:mi>b</z:mi></z:mrow><z:mrow><z:mn>2</z:mn></z:mrow></z:msubsup><z:msub><z:mrow><z:mi>χ</z:mi></z:mrow><z:mrow><z:msup><z:mrow><z:mn>1</z:mn></z:mrow><z:mrow><z:mo>−</z:mo></z:mrow></z:msup></z:mrow></z:msub><z:mo>=</z:mo><z:mn>1.161</z:mn><z:mo stretchy="false">(</z:mo><z:mn>54</z:mn><z:mo stretchy="false">)</z:mo><z:mo>×</z:mo><z:msup><z:mrow><z:mn>10</z:mn></z:mrow><z:mrow><z:mo>−</z:mo><z:mn>2</z:mn></z:mrow></z:msup></z:mrow></z:math>, <fb:math xmlns:fb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><fb:mrow><fb:msub><fb:mrow><fb:mi>χ</fb:mi></fb:mrow><fb:mrow><fb:msup><fb:mrow><fb:mn>0</fb:mn></fb:mrow><fb:mrow><fb:mo>−</fb:mo></fb:mrow></fb:msup></fb:mrow></fb:msub><fb:mo>=</fb:mo><fb:mn>2.374</fb:mn><fb:mo stretchy="false">(</fb:mo><fb:mn>33</fb:mn><fb:mo stretchy="false">)</fb:mo><fb:mo>×</fb:mo><fb:msup><fb:mrow><fb:mn>10</fb:mn></fb:mrow><fb:mrow><fb:mo>−</fb:mo><fb:mn>2</fb:mn></fb:mrow></fb:msup></fb:mrow></fb:math>, and <jb:math xmlns:jb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><jb:mrow><jb:msub><jb:mrow><jb:mi>χ</jb:mi></jb:mrow><jb:mrow><jb:msup><jb:mrow><jb:mn>0</jb:mn></jb:mrow><jb:mrow><jb:mo>+</jb:mo></jb:mrow></jb:msup></jb:mrow></jb:msub><jb:mo>=</jb:mo><jb:mn>0.609</jb:mn><jb:mo stretchy="false">(</jb:mo><jb:mn>14</jb:mn><jb:mo stretchy="false">)</jb:mo><jb:mo>×</jb:mo><jb:msup><jb:mrow><jb:mn>10</jb:mn></jb:mrow><jb:mrow><jb:mo>−</jb:mo><jb:mn>2</jb:mn></jb:mrow></jb:msup></jb:mrow></jb:math>. Our results for the (pseudo)scalar, vector, and axial vector are compatible with the expected small size of nonperturbative effects at <nb:math xmlns:nb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><nb:mi>u</nb:mi><nb:mo>=</nb:mo><nb:msub><nb:mi>m</nb:mi><nb:mi>c</nb:mi></nb:msub><nb:mo>/</nb:mo><nb:msub><nb:mi>m</nb:mi><nb:mi>b</nb:mi></nb:msub></nb:math>. We also give the first nonperturbative determination of the tensor susceptibilities, finding <pb:math xmlns:pb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><pb:mrow><pb:msubsup><pb:mrow><pb:mover accent="true"><pb:mrow><pb:mi>m</pb:mi></pb:mrow><pb:mrow><pb:mo stretchy="true">¯</pb:mo></pb:mrow></pb:mover></pb:mrow><pb:mrow><pb:mi>b</pb:mi></pb:mrow><pb:mrow><pb:mn>2</pb:mn></pb:mrow></pb:msubsup><pb:msub><pb:mrow><pb:mi>χ</pb:mi></pb:mrow><pb:mrow><pb:mi>T</pb:mi></pb:mrow></pb:msub><pb:mo>=</pb:mo><pb:mn>0.891</pb:mn><pb:mo stretchy="false">(</pb:mo><pb:mn>44</pb:mn><pb:mo stretchy="false">)</pb:mo><pb:mo>×</pb:mo><pb:msup><pb:mrow><pb:mn>10</pb:mn></pb:mrow><pb:mrow><pb:mo>−</pb:mo><pb:mn>2</pb:mn></pb:mrow></pb:msup></pb:mrow></pb:math> and <vb:math xmlns:vb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><vb:mrow><vb:msubsup><vb:mrow><vb:mover accent="true"><vb:mrow><vb:mi>m</vb:mi></vb:mrow><vb:mrow><vb:mo stretchy="true">¯</vb:mo></vb:mrow></vb:mover></vb:mrow><vb:mrow><vb:mi>b</vb:mi></vb:mrow><vb:mrow><vb:mn>2</vb:mn></vb:mrow></vb:msubsup><vb:msub><vb:mrow><vb:mi>χ</vb:mi></vb:mrow><vb:mrow><vb:mi>A</vb:mi><vb:mi>T</vb:mi></vb:mrow></vb:msub><vb:mo>=</vb:mo><vb:mn>0.441</vb:mn><vb:mo stretchy="false">(</vb:mo><vb:mn>33</vb:mn><vb:mo stretchy="false">)</vb:mo><vb:mo>×</vb:mo><vb:msup><vb:mrow><vb:mn>10</vb:mn></vb:mrow><vb:mrow><vb:mo>−</vb:mo><vb:mn>2</vb:mn></vb:mrow></vb:msup></vb:mrow></vb:math>. Our value of <bc:math xmlns:bc="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><bc:mrow><bc:msubsup><bc:mrow><bc:mover accent="true"><bc:mrow><bc:mi>m</bc:mi></bc:mrow><bc:mrow><bc:mo stretchy="true">¯</bc:mo></bc:mrow></bc:mover></bc:mrow><bc:mrow><bc:mi>b</bc:mi></bc:mrow><bc:mrow><bc:mn>2</bc:mn></bc:mrow></bc:msubsup><bc:msub><bc:mrow><bc:mi>χ</bc:mi></bc:mrow><bc:mrow><bc:mi>A</bc:mi><bc:mi>T</bc:mi></bc:mrow></bc:msub></bc:mrow></bc:math> is in good agreement with the <fc:math xmlns:fc="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><fc:mi mathvariant="script">O</fc:mi><fc:mo stretchy="false">(</fc:mo><fc:msub><fc:mi>α</fc:mi><fc:mi>s</fc:mi></fc:msub><fc:mo stretchy="false">)</fc:mo></fc:math> perturbation theory, while our result for <kc:math xmlns:kc="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><kc:msubsup><kc:mover accent="true"><kc:mi>m</kc:mi><kc:mo stretchy="true">¯</kc:mo></kc:mover><kc:mi>b</kc:mi><kc:mn>2</kc:mn></kc:msubsup><kc:msub><kc:mi>χ</kc:mi><kc:mi>T</kc:mi></kc:msub></kc:math> is in tension with the <oc:math xmlns:oc="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><oc:mi mathvariant="script">O</oc:mi><oc:mo stretchy="false">(</oc:mo><oc:msub><oc:mi>α</oc:mi><oc:mi>s</oc:mi></oc:msub><oc:mo stretchy="false">)</oc:mo></oc:math> perturbation theory at the level of <tc:math xmlns:tc="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><tc:mn>2</tc:mn><tc:mi>σ</tc:mi></tc:math>. These results will allow for dispersively bounded parametrizations to be employed using lattice inputs for the full set of <vc:math xmlns:vc="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><vc:mi>h</vc:mi><vc:mo stretchy="false">→</vc:mo><vc:mi>c</vc:mi></vc:math> semileptonic form factors in future calculations, for heavy-quark masses in the range <yc:math xmlns:yc="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><yc:mrow><yc:mn>1.25</yc:mn><yc:mo>×</yc:mo><yc:msub><yc:mrow><yc:mi>m</yc:mi></yc:mrow><yc:mrow><yc:mi>c</yc:mi></yc:mrow></yc:msub><yc:mo>≤</yc:mo><yc:msub><yc:mrow><yc:mi>m</yc:mi></yc:mrow><yc:mrow><yc:mi>h</yc:mi></yc:mrow></yc:msub><yc:mo>≤</yc:mo><yc:msub><yc:mrow><yc:mi>m</yc:mi></yc:mrow><yc:mrow><yc:mi>b</yc:mi></yc:mrow></yc:msub></yc:mrow></yc:math>.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Judd Harrison (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: