Objective Test the efficacy of a brief 2-hr parenting intervention in increasing protective factors against and reducing risk factors for infant obesity. Method A 2 (Baby Healthy Living Triple P vs. care-as-usual) × 3 (baseline, postintervention, 6-month follow-up) design was used. Eighty-two parents of 4- to 18-month-old infants meeting at least two risk factors for early childhood obesity (e.g., parent/child overweight, low education level) were randomized to intervention (n = 42) or control group (n = 40). Parents questionnaires and child weight status was measured. Results Results showed an intervention effect on a primary outcome, early feeding practices (restrictive: d = 0.44, 95% CI [−0.01,0.88], pressuring: d = 0.11, 95% CI [−0.32,0.54], nonresponsive behaviors: (d = 0.32, 95% CI [−0.11,0.75]), and on a secondary outcome, feeding beliefs (d = 0.29, 95% CI [−0.14,0.73]). No beneficial impact was found on other primary outcomes (responsiveness in feeding: quantity d = 0.50, 95% CI [−0.03,1.03]) and nutritive d = 0.52, 95% CI [−0.03,1.07], mealtime environment: d = 0.35, 95% CI [−0.78,0.08], self-efficacy in responsive feeding: d = 0.21, 95% CI [−0.22,0.64]), or secondary outcomes (parental self-efficacy: d = 0.08, 95% CI [−0.50,0.35]), parent emotional eating (d = 0.01, 95% CI [−0.43,0.43]), food restraint (d = 0.42, 95% CI [−0.85,0.02]), and body satisfaction (d = 0.01, 95% CI [−0.43,0.43]) and child weight status (d = 0.11, 95% CI [−0.54,0.32]). Conclusions Promising though limited support was demonstrated for a brief, low-intensity program to help parents in the prevention of obesity for infants at risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gelmini et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: