Randomized trial shows mindfulness with nutrition decreases obesity risk in young children, suggesting important benefits.
OBJECTIVE To assess whether a novel parent stress with nutrition vs nutrition alone intervention decreases early childhood obesity risk. METHODS A prospective, parallel, 12-week randomized controlled trial with parents who were overweight (114 dyads body mass index [BMI]: 34.7 ± 6.6) and their young children (aged 2–5 years) was conducted between November 2018 and July 2022. Parenting Mindfully for Health (PMH+N) was compared with the control (CTL+N) weekly group intervention, each with nutrition and physical activity (N) psychoeducation. Changes in child BMI and parent stress were coprimary outcomes, whereas observed parenting in an established laboratory-based parent-child Toy-Wait Task (TWT) and child food intake were secondary outcomes. RESULTS Child BMI z score significantly increased by 0.41 ([0.13, 0.69], P < .005) in the CTL+N, but PMH+N remained unchanged (0.20 [−0.49, 0.09], P > .17) over the 3-month follow-up, and parent stress decreased (3.17 [−5.19, −1.15] points, P < .003) only in the PMH+N arm. Significant time main effects indicated increased TWT positive parenting (2.82 [1.24, 4.4], P < .001) and reduced unhealthy child food intake (−1.78 [−3.02, −0.54]), driven by the PMH+N arm (P values <.02). Parent stress interacted with PMH+N vs CTL+N intervention to predict lower TWT positive parenting and child healthy food intake in the CTL+N arm (−1.74 [−3.26, −0.22] and −3.41 [−7.25, 0.42], respectively). CONCLUSIONS Targeting parent stress with healthy nutrition is effective in preventing short-term early childhood obesity risk and in improving positive parenting and child healthy food intake. Further assessment of long-term effects of the PMH+N intervention on early childhood risk is warranted. (Clinical Trials Registration: NCT03950453)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fogelman et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: