The question of paradox and its relation to the Qurʾān is largely unexplored. Indeed, modern studies on the Qurʾān have often been shaped by a goal, stated or otherwise, to demonstrate that the Qurʾān has no real logical, or theological, contradictions or inconsistencies. In this article I propose that the Qurʾān thoughtfully uses the category of paradox to instill wonder in the reader regarding the transcendence of God’s nature and God’s will. I do this through an examination of a recent study on paradox in the Gospel of Mark, and then through an examination of five qurʾānic case studies: God’s guidance and misguidance; God’s nature; God’s will and judgment; ethics in the story of al-Khiḍr; and the personification of false gods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gabriel Said Reynolds (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: