Motivated by recent theoretical predictions about the existence of a <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:mi>B</a:mi><a:mover accent="true"><a:mi>B</a:mi><a:mo stretchy="false">¯</a:mo></a:mover></a:math> bound state [also denoted as <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><e:mi>X</e:mi><e:mo stretchy="false">(</e:mo><e:mn>10550</e:mn><e:mo stretchy="false">)</e:mo></e:math>], in this work we estimate the production of the <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><i:mi>S</i:mi></i:math>-wave <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><k:msup><k:mi>B</k:mi><k:mo>+</k:mo></k:msup><k:msup><k:mi>B</k:mi><k:mo>−</k:mo></k:msup></k:math> molecule via <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><m:mi mathvariant="normal">ϒ</m:mi><m:mo stretchy="false">(</m:mo><m:mn>4</m:mn><m:mi>S</m:mi><m:mo stretchy="false">)</m:mo></m:math> radiative decays. In particular, we make use of effective Lagrangian approach and the compositeness condition to calculate the <r:math xmlns:r="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><r:mi>X</r:mi><r:mo stretchy="false">(</r:mo><r:mn>10550</r:mn><r:mo stretchy="false">)</r:mo></r:math> production rate via <v:math xmlns:v="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><v:mi mathvariant="normal">ϒ</v:mi><v:mo stretchy="false">(</v:mo><v:mn>4</v:mn><v:mi>S</v:mi><v:mo stretchy="false">)</v:mo><v:mo stretchy="false">→</v:mo><v:mi>γ</v:mi><v:mi>X</v:mi><v:mo stretchy="false">(</v:mo><v:mn>10550</v:mn><v:mo stretchy="false">)</v:mo></v:math> decays employing triangle diagrams. Our results show that the partial decay width of this reaction is of the order of 0.5–192 keV for a respective binding energy of 1–100 MeV, corresponding to a branching fraction of <db:math xmlns:db="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><db:mrow><db:msup><db:mrow><db:mn>10</db:mn></db:mrow><db:mrow><db:mo>−</db:mo><db:mn>5</db:mn></db:mrow></db:msup><db:mi>–</db:mi><db:mrow><db:msup><db:mrow><db:mn>10</db:mn></db:mrow><db:mrow><db:mo>−</db:mo><db:mn>3</db:mn></db:mrow></db:msup></db:mrow></db:mrow></db:math>. These findings suggest that the existence of the <fb:math xmlns:fb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><fb:mi>X</fb:mi><fb:mo stretchy="false">(</fb:mo><fb:mn>10550</fb:mn><fb:mo stretchy="false">)</fb:mo></fb:math> might be checked via the analysis of the mentioned decay in present and future experiments. Published by the American Physical Society 2024
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Britto et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: