In this paper, the new particle <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:mi>X</a:mi><a:mo stretchy="false">(</a:mo><a:mn>3842</a:mn><a:mo stretchy="false">)</a:mo></a:math> discovered by the LHCb Collaboration is identified to be the <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><e:msub><e:mi>ψ</e:mi><e:mn>3</e:mn></e:msub><e:mo stretchy="false">(</e:mo><e:msup><e:mn>1</e:mn><e:mn>3</e:mn></e:msup><e:msub><e:mi>D</e:mi><e:mn>3</e:mn></e:msub><e:mo stretchy="false">)</e:mo></e:math> state. We study its strong decays with the combination of the Bethe-Salpeter method and the <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><i:mrow><i:msub><i:mrow><i:mmultiscripts><i:mrow><i:mi>P</i:mi></i:mrow><i:mprescripts/><i:none/><i:mn>3</i:mn></i:mmultiscripts></i:mrow><i:mn>0</i:mn></i:msub></i:mrow></i:math> model. Its electromagnetic (EM) decay is also calculated by the Bethe-Salpeter method within the Mandelstam formalism. The strong decay widths are <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><k:mrow><k:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</k:mi><k:mo stretchy="false">[</k:mo><k:mi>X</k:mi><k:mo stretchy="false">(</k:mo><k:mn>3842</k:mn><k:mo stretchy="false">)</k:mo><k:mo stretchy="false">→</k:mo><k:msup><k:mrow><k:mi>D</k:mi></k:mrow><k:mrow><k:mn>0</k:mn></k:mrow></k:msup><k:msup><k:mrow><k:mover accent="true"><k:mrow><k:mi>D</k:mi></k:mrow><k:mrow><k:mo stretchy="false">¯</k:mo></k:mrow></k:mover></k:mrow><k:mrow><k:mn>0</k:mn></k:mrow></k:msup><k:mo stretchy="false">]</k:mo><k:mo>=</k:mo><k:mn>1.27</k:mn><k:mtext> </k:mtext><k:mi>MeV</k:mi></k:mrow></k:math> and <u:math xmlns:u="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><u:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</u:mi><u:mo stretchy="false">[</u:mo><u:mi>X</u:mi><u:mo stretchy="false">(</u:mo><u:mn>3823</u:mn><u:mo stretchy="false">)</u:mo><u:mo stretchy="false">→</u:mo><u:mspace linebreak="goodbreak"/><u:msup><u:mi>D</u:mi><u:mo>+</u:mo></u:msup><u:msup><u:mi>D</u:mi><u:mo>−</u:mo></u:msup><u:mo stretchy="false">]</u:mo><u:mo>=</u:mo><u:mn>1.08</u:mn><u:mtext> </u:mtext><u:mtext> </u:mtext><u:mi>MeV</u:mi></u:math>, and the ratio is <db:math xmlns:db="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><db:mi mathvariant="script">B</db:mi><db:mo stretchy="false">[</db:mo><db:mi>X</db:mi><db:mo stretchy="false">(</db:mo><db:mn>3842</db:mn><db:mo stretchy="false">)</db:mo><db:mo stretchy="false">→</db:mo><db:msup><db:mi>D</db:mi><db:mo>+</db:mo></db:msup><db:msup><db:mi>D</db:mi><db:mo>−</db:mo></db:msup><db:mo stretchy="false">]</db:mo><db:mo>/</db:mo><db:mi mathvariant="script">B</db:mi><db:mo stretchy="false">[</db:mo><db:mi>X</db:mi><db:mo stretchy="false">(</db:mo><db:mn>3823</db:mn><db:mo stretchy="false">)</db:mo><db:mo stretchy="false">→</db:mo><db:msup><db:mi>D</db:mi><db:mn>0</db:mn></db:msup><db:msup><db:mover accent="true"><db:mi>D</db:mi><db:mo stretchy="false">¯</db:mo></db:mover><db:mn>0</db:mn></db:msup><db:mo stretchy="false">]</db:mo><db:mo>=</db:mo><db:mn>0.84</db:mn></db:math>. The EM decay width is <tb:math xmlns:tb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><tb:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</tb:mi><tb:mo stretchy="false">[</tb:mo><tb:mi>X</tb:mi><tb:mo stretchy="false">(</tb:mo><tb:mn>3842</tb:mn><tb:mo stretchy="false">)</tb:mo><tb:mo stretchy="false">→</tb:mo><tb:msub><tb:mi>χ</tb:mi><tb:mrow><tb:mi>c</tb:mi><tb:mn>2</tb:mn></tb:mrow></tb:msub><tb:mi>γ</tb:mi><tb:mo stretchy="false">]</tb:mo><tb:mo>=</tb:mo><tb:mn>0.29</tb:mn><tb:mtext> </tb:mtext><tb:mtext> </tb:mtext><tb:mi>MeV</tb:mi></tb:math>. We also estimate the total width to be 2.87 MeV, which is in good agreement with the experimental data <bc:math xmlns:bc="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><bc:msubsup><bc:mn>2.79</bc:mn><bc:mrow><bc:mo>−</bc:mo><bc:mn>0.86</bc:mn></bc:mrow><bc:mrow><bc:mo>+</bc:mo><bc:mn>0.86</bc:mn></bc:mrow></bc:msubsup><bc:mtext> </bc:mtext><bc:mtext> </bc:mtext><bc:mi>MeV</bc:mi></bc:math>. Since the used relativistic wave functions include different partial waves, we also study the contributions of different partial waves in electromagnetic decay. Published by the American Physical Society 2024
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: