Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective: To investigate the clinical efficacy of metoprolol succinate extended-release tablets in the treatment of post-myocardial infarction ventricular arrhythmias. Methods: The clinical data of 84 patients with post-myocardial infarction ventricular arrhythmia included in the study were collected and they were divided into Groups A and B with 42 cases each using the randomization method. Group A was treated with oral glucosamine hydrochloride, while Group B was administered oral metoprolol succinate extended-release tablets. Combined indicators were used to evaluate the improvement of clinical indicators, therapeutic effects, and the incidence of adverse reactions in the two groups. Results: The baseline data of the two groups of patients were not statistically significant (Pall > 0.05); after treatment, the QT dispersion, corrected QT dispersion, and heart rate of Group B were lower than that of Group A (Pall = 0.000 < 0.001); the total clinical effectiveness of Group B was 95.24%, which was significantly higher than 80.95% in Group A (χ2 = 4.087, P = 0.043 < 0.05); the total incidence of adverse reactions in Group B was 4.76%, which was significantly lower than 19.04% in Group A (χ2 = 4.087, P = 0.043 < 0.05). Conclusion: In the treatment of post-myocardial infarction ventricular arrhythmia, the use of metoprolol succinate extended-release tablets can effectively correct the QT dispersion of patients, improve their heart rate, increase clinical effectiveness, and reduce the incidence of adverse reactions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gao et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: