The radio interferometric closure phases can be a valuable tool for studying cosmological {H{I}}~from the early Universe. Closure phases have the advantage of being immune to element-based gains and associated calibration errors. Thus, calibration and errors therein, which are often sources of systematics limiting standard visibility-based approaches, can be avoided altogether in closure phase analysis. In this work, we present the first results of the closure phase power spectrum of {H{I}}~21-cm fluctuations using the Murchison Widefield Array (MWA), with ~ 12 hours of MWA-phase II observations centered around redshift, z≈ 6.79, during the Epoch of Reionisation. On analysing three redundant classes of baselines -- 14~m, 24~m, and 28~m equilateral triads, our estimates of the 2σ ($95%$ confidence interval) 21-cm power spectra are (184)² pseudo ~mK² at k|| = 0.36 pseudo~h Mpc⁻¹ in the EoR1 field for the 14~m baseline triads, and (188)² pseudo ~mK² at k|| = 0.18 pseudo~h Mpc⁻¹ in the EoR0 field for the 24~m baseline triads. The ``$pseudo$'' units denote that the length scale and brightness temperature should be interpreted as close approximations. Our best estimates are still 3-4 orders high compared to the fiducial 21-cm power spectrum; however, our approach provides promising estimates of the power spectra even with a small amount of data. These data-limited estimates can be further improved if more datasets are included into the analysis. The evidence for excess noise has a possible origin in baseline-dependent systematics in the MWA data that will require careful baseline-based strategies to mitigate, even in standard visibility-based approaches.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tiwari et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: