Background Tacrolimus is widely used to treat pediatric nephrotic range proteinuria (NRP). Diltiazem, a CYP3A4/5 inhibitor, is often administered with tacrolimus, affecting its pharmacokinetic profile. The impact of this combination on tacrolimus exposure, particularly in CYP3A5*3 genetic polymorphism, remains unclear in pediatric NRP patients. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of diltiazem on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics, focusing on the CYP3A5*3 polymorphism. Methods We conducted a retrospective clinical study involving pediatric NRP patients, divided into two groups: those receiving tacrolimus with diltiazem and those receiving tacrolimus alone. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the baseline characteristics between the groups. We compared daily dose-adjusted trough concentrations (C 0 /D) of tacrolimus in both the original and PSM cohorts. The influence of diltiazem on tacrolimus C 0 /D, stratified by CYP3A5*3 genetic polymorphism, was assessed in a self-controlled case series study. Results Before PSM, the tacrolimus C 0 /D in patients taking diltiazem was significantly higher compared to those with tacrolimus alone (75.84 vs. 56.86 ng/mL per mg/kg, P = 0.034). This finding persisted after PSM (75.84 vs. 46.93 ng/mL per mg/kg, P = 0.028). In the self-controlled case study, tacrolimus C 0 /D elevated about twofold (75.84 vs. 34.76 ng/mL per mg/kg, P < 0.001) after diltiazem administration. CYP3A5 expressers ( CYP3A5*1/*1 and *1/*3 ) and CYP3A5 non-expressers ( CYP3A5*3/*3 ) experienced a 1.8-fold and 1.3-fold increase in tacrolimus C 0 /D when combined with diltiazem, respectively. Conclusion Diltiazem significantly increased tacrolimus C 0 /D, with CYP3A5*3 expressers showing higher elevations than non-expressers among pediatric NRP patients. These findings highlight the importance of personalized tacrolimus therapy based on CYP3A5*3 genotypes in pediatric patients taking diltiazem.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: