This study optimizes chitosan nanoparticles (Cts-NPs) for nucleic acid delivery, examining the impact of varying tripolyphosphate (TPP) to Cts molar ratios on zeta-potential, size, and binding efficiency. The zeta-potential of the Cts solution decreased from +38.85 mV to -0.12 mV as TPP increased. Samples S3 and S4, with zeta-potentials of +28.76 and +13.11 mV, were optimal due to their efficiency and nucleic acid binding capability. UV-visible spectroscopy confirmed DNA binding to Cts-NPs, and FTIR analysis revealed successful DNA incorporation through electrostatic interactions and cross-linking, crucial for stability and controlled release. TEM analysis showed S3 had an average NP size of 8.79 ± 2.23 nm, indicating uniform, spherical particles. GFP expression in HepG2 and HEK293 cells assessed transfection efficiency, comparing Cts-DNA NPs with Lipofectamine 2000, which achieved over 70% efficiency versus less than 10% for Cts- DNA NPs. Comparing Lipofectamine 3000, Transfex, and Fugene, Lipofectamine 3000 showed the highest efficiency (over 70%) but high cytotoxicity, especially in HepG2 cells. Transfex showed moderate efficiency (~40%) and cytotoxicity, while Fugene had the lowest efficiency (<10%) but minimal cytotoxicity. In conclusion, S3 and S4 Cts-NPs balance size, charge, and efficiency for nucleic acid delivery, while Lipofectamine 3000 is highly effective but cytotoxic. Balancing efficiency and cytotoxicity are crucial for gene delivery systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bagheri et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: