Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Lumbar disc bulge is a prevalent cause of low back pain (LBP), contributing significantly to disability and healthcare costs. Innovative non-surgical treatments are required to address the limitations of traditional physical therapies.Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of lumbar regression techniques compared to standard physiotherapy in improving flexibility, reducing disability, and managing pain in patients with lumbar disc bulges.Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 24 participants diagnosed with lumbar disc bulge. Participants were divided into two groups: the experimental group (Group A) received lumbar regression techniques, and the control group (Group B) received standard physiotherapy. The interventions lasted for 8 weeks, with outcomes measured using the Straight Leg Raise (SLR), Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMD), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at baseline and post-intervention.Results: Group A demonstrated a significant improvement in SLR (baseline: 70.0 ± 8.0, 8th week: 85.0 ± 7.0; p=0.004), RMD (baseline: 15.0 ± 4.5, 8th week: 10.0 ± 3.0; p=0.032), and VAS scores (baseline: 7.0 ± 1.5, 8th week: 3.0 ± 0.6; p=0.026) compared to Group B.Conclusion: Lumbar regression techniques significantly improved flexibility, reduced disability, and alleviated pain in patients with lumbar disc bulge more effectively than standard physiotherapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saddique et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: